The Web.0 public forum nature of these sites nadia site libertin tends to lead to an even worse mess than the bourse d echange damazan old (static) vanity websites.
In disgust, I have checked the "Hide the improved version of the Watchlist" in my preferences, thus going back to the watchlist's original version.For the sake of simplicity, I used John Smith and Jessica Hart.So whats in a name?As for having a latest version and a last reviewed version, I think we already have this mechanism in the form of Wikipedia:Pending changes.Isaacl ( talk ) 14:43, (UTC) That point was to suggest that most people receive their formal DS notice once they do something that provokes irritation on the article.Not exactly focused on improving anything.SC, the average stars that the current article received by the users (and that stars are a new suggestion).It might be something like "remind-meperiod7days" or "remind-meatdd-mm-yyyy".Surely responding to handful users abusing a tempory protect function will take far less admin time than the current RPP system?The reasons stated by me to them were as follows: It is my view that when incidents are brought before the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for a decision, due to the overwhelming number of incidents, that some minor incidents may occasionally be brought, haphazardly, before the board.If someone later comes to actually flesh out more than just a stub with reliable sources, great, otherwise we still have a searchable term and in a location that logically makes sense.peter told me he chuckled at the comment, and the conversation moved on, but he thought about what his father, the acknowledged master of crime fiction, had told him.Work for a company whose article is the one submitted to them for review etc.Smartyllama ( talk ) 13:08, (UTC) Obviously.We cruise on autopilot by summarizing the contents of review articles, but this can lead to inaccuracies.The topic evolved over that time and the article kept.If there were several mechanisms, they would probably not compete with one another, but rather help one another by making the practice more mainstream.Each edit can have TWO markers set, each on or off: (1) choosing between ordinarily deleted or not; (2) choosing between "revision-deleted" or not.Xaosflux Talk 21:13, (UTC) I did not withdraw my request, which I still feel has merit and has met with the approval of two other editors here.The delivery mechanism might be something like the notification when a replyUserFoo is done.
I raised the idea that perhaps the Wikipedia:Banning policy needs amending.
But if there were simple facilities, I think more admins would.
In sensitivity training, we are taught that even though the disabled person interacts with the assistance of a helper, you are not interacting with the helper but with the disabled person.